The FCC Shuts EchoStar Out of Its Own $2.4bn Vendor Trust, Two Days After AT&T's $23bn Close Funded It
AT&T closed its $23bn purchase of EchoStar's 600 MHz and 3.45 GHz licences on 28 July 2026, and the same day the $2.4bn trust fund the FCC had required as a condition of approval was created and funded, with Bank of New York Mellon as trustee. Two days later the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau issued order DA 26-797, holding that an $8.8bn intercompany claim EchoStar had told a bankruptcy court could be paid from the fund is not a fund claim at all, and modifying the trust to exclude any claim of EchoStar, its subsidiaries or affiliates, or any assignee of them. The fund exists because DISH Wireless, after spending more than $13bn on a network it held its licences on condition of building, began telling thousands of counterparties in September 2025 that it was excused from performing.

What happened
When the FCC approved EchoStar's sale of spectrum to AT&T and SpaceX for tens of billions of dollars in May 2026, it attached a condition it described as answering a precedentially novel fact pattern. EchoStar had built a nationwide 5G network because its licences required it, then, a number of commenters argued, indicated it would not pay the tower companies, fibre backhaul providers and construction firms that did the work. The Commission required EchoStar to create a $2.4bn trust fund within 30 days of consummation, to pay obligations arising out of building, operating, maintaining and decommissioning the network. One fund covers both transactions.
AT&T closed on 28 July 2026 and the fund was created and funded the same day, with Bank of New York Mellon as trustee. By then EchoStar subsidiaries including DISH Wireless were already in Chapter 11, filed 30 June 2026 in the Southern District of Texas. Their disclosure statement recorded that DISH Wireless and affiliates spent more than $13bn on the network between 2020 and 2025, funded primarily by an intercompany loan from non-debtor DISH Network Corporation, of which $8.8bn remains owed, and that from September 2025 DISH Wireless had sent notices to thousands of 5G network counterparties saying it was excused from performing.
EchoStar then told the bankruptcy court that the fund could be used to pay that intercompany loan. On 30 July 2026 the Bureau issued DA 26-797 and rejected the reading in plain terms: the fund pays entities that performed the work of building the network, not those that provided EchoStar the money to do it, and it explicitly modified the definition of a fund claim to exclude claims of EchoStar, its subsidiaries or affiliates, or any assignee.
The condition the buyer paid for
The 600 MHz licences carry the other half of the story. Section 27.14(t) requires a 600 MHz licensee to cover 40 percent of the population in each licence area within six years and 75 percent within twelve. AT&T does not operate in the band and asked for time, proposing to serve 40 percent of the US population within three years and 75 percent of the US population, or 40 percent of each licence area, within five. T-Mobile and the Rural Wireless Association objected that a population test would let rural areas wait, and pressed for geography-based coverage and drive testing; the RWA argued the Commission should instead reclaim and reallocate the spectrum under section 309(j) if AT&T could not meet the existing rules.
The Commission granted the waiver but refused the terms, imposing buildout conditions more substantial than AT&T had proposed. It also dismissed as moot the request to waive the 40 MHz aggregation limit on 3.45 GHz, because that limit had expired on 4 January 2026. The practical result is that the 3.45 GHz spectrum went live quickly across AT&T's existing footprint while the 600 MHz will take longer than a year to reach a handset, and the clock on the new obligations is already running.
Why it matters for dispute formation
A buildout condition is usually enforced against the licensee that accepted it. Here the licensee left. DISH accepted the 5G obligations in 2020 as the price of buying Boost Mobile out of the T-Mobile and Sprint merger, including a commitment not to sell its 600 MHz licences for six years without FCC approval, and it has now sold the spectrum, put the building subsidiary into Chapter 11 and asked to be repaid from the remedy fund. When the party that owes the obligation exits, the regulator's remaining lever is the money, and the fight moves from performance to priority.
That fight now runs on two tracks that do not share a rulebook. In Texas, the bankruptcy court will decide what the intercompany loan is worth against the estate. At the Commission, the trustee processes claims that have been settled by the parties or adjudicated by a court, under a definition the Bureau has just narrowed. A contractor with an unliquidated claim has to win somewhere before the fund will pay, and the force-majeure theory DISH Wireless asserted against thousands of counterparties has to be tested contract by contract. The Bureau has also kept jurisdiction to modify the process again, so the boundary of the fund is itself still a live question.
Who's exposed
Exposed as the licensee that sold its way out of a buildout obligation and is now barred from the fund that sale financed. Its subsidiaries filed Chapter 11 in the Southern District of Texas on 30 June 2026, and the Bureau has excluded from the trust any claim of EchoStar, its subsidiaries or affiliates, or an assignee of them. The Commission expressly took no position on whether the underlying $8.8bn intercompany claim is valid, only that it cannot be paid from this fund.
Exposed as the buyer that funded the condition. It acquired roughly 30 MHz of nationwide 3.45 GHz and roughly 20 MHz of nationwide 600 MHz covering about 99 percent of the US population, and deposited the $2.4bn at closing. It also carries buildout obligations the Commission made more stringent than the ones AT&T itself proposed, having been granted a waiver of the inherited section 27.14(t) deadlines only on that basis.
Exposed as the intended beneficiaries of the fund and the parties that put it there. The Wireless Infrastructure Association, the American Wireless Builders Coalition, NATE, FirstLight Fiber and 1 Source Tower pressed the Commission on the point, and more than 200 lawsuits have already been filed against DISH Wireless since it began sending non-performance notices.
Exposed as the creditors behind the excluded claim. The $8.8bn intercompany receivable was assigned to a trust for the benefit of certain DISH DBS Corporation noteholders, and parties argued it could be asserted outside bankruptcy in a way that would exhaust the fund. DA 26-797 closes that route, which pushes their recovery back onto the bankruptcy estate.
The historical parallel · The DISH buildout conditions from the T-Mobile / Sprint merger (WT Docket 18-197, DISH Modification Order, 35 FCC Rcd 9580)
The obligations now being unwound were themselves a merger remedy. To clear the 2019 T-Mobile and Sprint merger, DISH bought Boost and committed to become a nationwide facilities-based competitor running a first-of-its-kind 5G network built from the ground up, and in September 2020 the Wireless Bureau wrote those commitments into its licences, including a promise not to sell the 600 MHz licences for six years without approval. The remedy was structural: a fourth carrier would exist because a licence condition said so. Six years on the network is being decommissioned, the spectrum is going to the second-largest carrier, Boost survives as a hybrid MNO riding AT&T's radio network, and the Commission is left administering a fund rather than a competitor. The lesson for anyone relying on a behavioural condition is that it binds a balance sheet, and a balance sheet can be sold.
What to watch
- How the trustee treats unliquidated contractor claims, given that the fund pays only what has been settled or adjudicated.
- Whether EchoStar seeks reconsideration or review of DA 26-797, or challenges the Bureau's authority to redefine a fund claim after the fund was funded.
- Rulings in the Southern District of Texas on the $8.8bn intercompany claim and on the force-majeure notices sent from September 2025.
- Whether $2.4bn proves adequate once the 200-plus lawsuits and the settled claims are totalled, and what happens to the shortfall if it is not.
- AT&T's progress against the tightened 600 MHz buildout conditions, and whether T-Mobile or the RWA press the Commission on compliance.
Sources
- FCC — Memorandum Opinion and Order DA 26-797 (30 July 2026), narrowing the fund
- FCC — AT&T / EchoStar Memorandum Opinion and Order DA 26-470 (WT Docket 25-303)
- Communications Daily — FCC limits use of the $2.4bn DISH trust fund
- Inside Towers — FCC clarifies the trust fund is only for 5G buildout suppliers
- StockTitan — AT&T closes acquisition of spectrum licences from EchoStar
- TechTimes — 3.45 GHz live nationwide, 600 MHz not ready
- 5Gstore — AT&T spectrum deal: $23bn EchoStar buy closes
- Broadband Breakfast — AT&T and EchoStar fire back at spectrum deal opponents
- EchoStar — spectrum sale and hybrid MNO agreement announcement
See the disputes forming before the market does.
Signal Watch tracks the developments. The monthly Intelligence Brief synthesizes all four signals into the disputes most likely to crystallize next — free.
Get the Intelligence BriefFor general information only; not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is formed through this article. Company names appear because the companies are exposed to a public development — not as a statement of wrongdoing or a predicted outcome. Figures are as reported by the linked sources.